Reviewer
REVIEWER GUIDELINES
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Rekayasa Informatika (TRINET)
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Rekayasa Informatika (TRINET) highly values the contribution of reviewers in maintaining the quality, credibility, and integrity of published research. Reviewers play a crucial role in the peer review process and are expected to adhere to high ethical and professional standards.
1. Role of Reviewers
Reviewers assist the Editorial Board in:
-
Evaluating the scientific quality of manuscripts
-
Assessing originality and contribution to the field
-
Identifying methodological strengths and weaknesses
-
Providing constructive feedback for improvement
-
Supporting editorial decisions
TRINET applies a double-blind peer review system.
2. Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers are expected to:
2.1 Confidentiality
Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents. Manuscripts must not be shared or discussed with others without editorial permission.
2.2 Objectivity
Provide fair, unbiased, and constructive evaluations supported by clear arguments.
2.3 Timeliness
Complete reviews within the agreed review period. If unable to meet the deadline, reviewers should inform the editor promptly.
2.4 Acknowledgment of Sources
Identify relevant published work not cited by the authors and report any substantial similarity to other works.
2.5 Conflict of Interest
Decline to review manuscripts in which there is any conflict of interest due to personal, financial, institutional, or collaborative relationships.
3. Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
-
Relevance to the journal’s scope
-
Originality and novelty
-
Significance of contribution
-
Research methodology
-
Data analysis and interpretation
-
Clarity of presentation
-
Quality of references
4. Review Recommendations
Reviewers are requested to provide one of the following recommendations:
-
Accept
-
Minor Revision
-
Major Revision
-
Reject
Detailed comments must be provided to justify the recommendation.
5. Ethical Standards
Reviewers must:
-
Not use unpublished material for personal research
-
Not retain copies of manuscripts after review completion
-
Report suspected ethical misconduct (plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate submission)
TRINET follows international publication ethics standards in handling ethical concerns.
6. Reviewer Recognition
TRINET may provide:
-
Certificate of reviewing
-
Acknowledgment in the journal (annual list of reviewers)
-
Reviewer performance record in OJS
